Dodgers, Elysian Park Ventures, and Japan’s Stadium Innovation Frontier 1 of 3
Key Takeaways:
The Dodgers built Elysian Park Ventures to systematize innovation by investing in about seventy sports-tech startups and plugging their tools into training, content, and club operations.
A century-old, title-winning, Ohtani-led franchise worth $6.8 billion still treats innovation as mandatory, which highlights the gap in Japan, where stadiums have cultural weight but remain underused as structured tech platforms.
Stadiums can be dense, data-rich urban labs where open innovation becomes operational. JSP’s task is to connect civic systems and global capital so new technologies integrate into venue operations rather than stay on the sidelines.
Article Summary
Commentary: Dodgers and Japan Innovation (Nikkei, November 29, 2025)
The article profiles Elysian Park Ventures, launched a decade ago by the Dodgers’ owners and now invested in about seventy sports-tech startups whose tools feed into training, fan content, and club operations. Even with nearly 150 years of history and back-to-back titles, the Dodgers keep reinventing and reached a 2025 valuation of $6.8 billion, up twenty five percent year on year. Elysian’s Jay Adya warns that ignoring innovation invites surprises. The article contrasts this discipline with Japan’s often superficial open-innovation efforts and points to Honda and Hitachi as examples of deeper, more integrated approaches.
(Note: Article in Japanese language.)
The Dodgers Treat Innovation as Core Stadium Infrastructure
The article describes a striking structure: an ownership-backed venture platform investing in about 70 startups, with their solutions actively applied to player performance, fan relationships, and internal operations.
For the Dodgers, innovation is not off to the side. It runs through the asset itself.
Stadium usage produces data for biometric analysis.
Player-content workflows deepen fan ties.
New systems feed into day-to-day management.
The stadium becomes a constant laboratory where new tools are tested with real athletes, staff, and fans. This is a governance choice: innovation becomes an internal capability rather than an external scouting activity.
Most Japanese stadiums, though world-class in build quality, operate on fixed routines and rarely embed startup technologies into daily workflows. That stability has cultural value but limits growth. By treating venues as places where innovation is expected and absorbed into operations, Japan’s stadium network could turn fixed assets into adaptive engines for logistics, performance, safety, sustainability, and fan engagement.
Tradition Plus Innovation is a High-Return Combination
The article places Elysian’s activity in context: a franchise with nearly 150 years of history, back-to-back World Series titles, and a global star in Ohtani. It notes the Dodgers’ $6.8-billion valuation, up twenty five percent year over year.
This combination of legacy, performance, and innovation shows the club treats its heritage as a platform rather than a constraint. The signal is simple: tradition increases the return on reinvention.
For Japan’s teams and stadium operators, the risk is not weak foundations but overreliance on them. Stadiums carry enormous cultural weight, yet their operating models remain conservative. The Dodgers illustrate that heritage does not shield an organization from disruption; it raises the stakes and expands the upside. Japanese venues—from municipal facilities to privately owned arenas—can unlock similar value when startup capabilities flow into training, mobility, security, or content workflows. The underlying formula is clear: Heritage × Performance × Innovation = Durable Asset Value.
The Warning for Japan: Open Innovation Fails When It Does Not Touch Operations
The article explicitly criticizes shallow Japanese OI practices: many CVC initiatives operate far from core business functions and produce little operational impact. It contrasts this with Honda and Hitachi, which invested significant time and leadership bandwidth to embed startups into product development and business lines.
The Dodgers’ model mirrors this deeper approach. Elysian Park Ventures works because the stadium and the team are the immediate adopters of new tech.
For Japan’s stadium sector, the message is direct:
Innovation must be operational, not peripheral.
Pilots must take place inside the venue, not in detached innovation labs.
The stadium calendar can supply recurring demand signals that startups can test against—crowd flows, event-day logistics, security layers, and athlete workflows.
Many Japanese stadiums have the perfect conditions for this. They already face congestion patterns, demographic shifts, sustainability targets, and municipal service demands that create fertile ground for real-world experimentation.
Our Perspective: Positioning Japan’s Stadiums as National Innovation Engines
Japan Stadium Partners sees the Dodgers–Elysian example as evidence that stadiums become far more valuable when they function as structured innovation engines, not just event venues. The article shows how a historic, high-performing franchise embeds startup capabilities directly into training, content, and operations. Japan’s venues can follow this path by turning their dense, civic-facing environments into practical test beds where mobility, sustainability, analytics, and fan-experience technologies mature into deployable systems that strengthen both asset value and urban vitality.
In Part 2, we will examine Honda’s and Hitachi’s open-innovation models and extract the organizational structures Japan’s stadiums need to embed innovation into daily operations.
(All images in this post are licensed stock images used for illustrative purposes only. Viewer discretion is appreciated.)
